An Assembly for Europe: The Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly, 1948-1989
This book by a former Secretary General tells the story of the origins
and growth of the first pan- European assembly of parliamentarians. It
is a book for popular consumption, a book for the uninitiated. As a Council
of Europe publication, it takes an over(t)ly rosy view of the institutions
development and present status. Though billed as a book about the assembly,
it actually focuses a lot on the Council of Europe as a whole as well as
events in Europe more generally. The author also cannot forebear from numerous
references to the post-Cold War era, despite the stated intention for there
to be a second volume considering this period.
The book notes that the creation of the Council of Europe and the significance
of the assembly came among the immediate post-war aspirations for greater
integration in Europe. These hopes were soon dashed in the intergovernmental
stalement of the Council of Europe, though they promptly reappeared in
the European Coal and Steel Community and subsequently the European Economic
Community). While the author lauds the various achievements of the Council
of Europe, particularly the European Covenant and Court of Human Rights,
as well as encouragement of cooperation on cultural issues, human rights,
youth, and science and technology, there is no hiding the disappointment
that the bigger European project never really took off, at least not as
the integrationist founders of the Council of Europe had hoped.
Though it is now called the Parliamentary Assembly, it is still functionally
a consultative framework. The title parliamentary is an indication of its
membership, not its powers, which are limited whether one is thinking of
either oversight or control. Though you wont find the argument here, the
innovation of other institutions in Europe is at least an implicit and
occasionally explicit criticism of the failures or limits of the Council
of Europe and its assembly. Even before the completion of the Eastern enlargement,
the EUs European Parliament was widely regarded as Europes Parliament.
It does at least have some measure of parliamentary power and influence
over decision-making, albeit circumscribed.
The Council of Europe and the Parliamentary Assembly have survived nonetheless,
partly from being useful in specific sectors and partly by taking on new
roles, today being the conscience of Europe, through the European Covenant
of Human Rights, and being in the vanguard of the enlargement of Europe.
With direct election of MEPs to the European Parliament, the Council of
Europes Parliamentary Assembly is the major venue where national parliamentarians
can discuss issues of common interest to Europeans.
Canada has been an Observer since 1997 and the regular exchanges of parliamentarians
serves a purpose of sharing best practices on a range of issues to do with
human rights and culture. Were the nations of the EU able to agree on the
incorporation of these issues into the EU framework, there would be little
need for the Council of Europe or Canadas modest participation with it.
Because this remains a very distant prospect, the Council of Europes Parliamentary
Assembly may have been superseded but it has yet to be transcended, and
the exchanges retain their value to Canadas MPs as a source of information
and occasionally even inspiration.