At the time this article was
written Diane Deschamps was a Committee Clerk with the Senate of Canada
The political debate now raging in
the Senate has rekindled the harshest kind of criticism of this parliamentary
institution. On the one hand, it is accused of being elitist and partisan,
while on the other, its legislative review function is questioned. This is the
second in a series of articles highlighting the different aspects of the
representative function of the Senate.
When the Senate was established in
1867, one of the aims of the Fathers of Confederation was to ensure not only
the presence of property owners in Parliament, but also the presence of
individuals who personnifed the moderating element in society - experienced,
conscientious and responsible individuals whose judgement would not be clouded
by electoral considerations or financial worries. The Fathers of Confederation therefore
decided to limit the power to appoint members to this Chamber by setting down a
series of conditions which are spelled out in section 23 of the Constitution
Act, 1867.
One of the conditions was that
senators be at least thirty years of age. The table on the following page shows
that most were already well past this age when appointed to the Upper Chamber.
It also shows the number of women who have been appointed to the Senate since
Confederation. In fact, women were not appointed to the Upper House until 1929.
Barely sixty years ago, women had
to fight to gain admittance to the Senate. They had to prove that they were
persons under the Canadian Constitution. Some opponents pointed to the repeated
use of the pronoun "he" to designate senators and concluded that half
of the population of Canada should therefore be denied the right to sit in the
Upper House. Others, however, noted that the British North America Act
allowed "persons" to be appointed and felt that the term included
women. Five Albertan women took this case all the way to the Supreme Court
which ruled against them. They then decided to appeal to the British Privy
Council in London which ruled in their favour and confirmed that women were
indeed persons under the Canadian Constitution. On February 15, 1930, Cairine
Wilson became the first woman to be appointed to the Senate. Since then, two
other women have served as speaker: the Hon. Muriel McQueen Ferguson, who
occupied the chair from December 1972 to 1974, and the Hon. Renaude Lapointe, who
served as speaker from September 1974 to October 1979. Currently, there are 15
women sitting in the Senate.
The age of senators has always
prompted many comments. Every opportunity is taken to stress the effects of old
age. Humorists often employ various metaphors when speaking about the Senate.
On two occasions, Canada had the distinction of having the oldest active
parliamentarian in the world. There was the Hon. David Wark who died in 1905 at
the age of 101, and the Hon. Georges-Casimir Dessaules who died in 1930 at the
age of 102. The youngest ever was the Hon. William Miller who was 32 years of
age when appointed on October 23, 1867. In 1965, retirement became mandatory
for senators at the age of 75. However, this rule applied only to those
appointed after June 2, 1965. (At present there are four senators over 75.)
Since this provision first took effect, the average age of senators, which was
around 70 in 1965, has declined, indicating the presence of a larger number of
youthful senators.
Average Age of Senatorss
|
1975
|
1980
|
1985
|
1990*
|
64
|
63.53
|
62.21
|
61.90
|
*October 1990
|
|
|
|
Source: Library
of Parliament Compilation
|
The Senate brings together men and women
from diverse backgrounds who for the most part have achieved recognition in
their respective fields. In looking at the composition of the Upper Chamber,
regardless of the period involved, we can see that prior to their appointment,
the majority of the senators distinguished themselves in the federal or
provincial political arena. Often, they had outstanding careers as
professionals, business people, authors or journalists. Some even excelled in
two or three fields. Nearly all received a post-secondary education and the
majority (82%) have earned a university degree. Professions represented in the
Senate run the gamut from business leader, lawyer, dentist and doctor to
farmer, journalist, union leader, accountant and teacher.
Age of Senators At Time of Appointment
|
|
|
30-39
|
40-49
|
50-59
|
60-69
|
70-79
|
80+
|
Total
|
Femmes
|
Nom
|
Année
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1867
|
3
|
18
|
29
|
18
|
4
|
1
|
73
|
-
|
John
A.
Macdonald
|
1868-1873
|
5
|
6
|
15
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
31
|
-
|
Alexander
Mackenzie
|
1873-1878
|
1
|
7
|
3
|
5
|
|
|
16
|
-
|
John
A.
Macdonald
|
1879-1891
|
3
|
17
|
21
|
15
|
4
|
|
60
|
-
|
John
Abbott
|
1892
|
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
6
|
-
|
John
Thompson
|
1892-1893
|
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
Mackenzie
Bowell
|
1895-1896
|
|
1
|
6
|
4
|
2
|
|
13
|
-
|
Charles
Tupper
|
1896
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Wilfrid
Laurier
|
1896-1911
|
3
|
13
|
25
|
28
|
10
|
2
|
81
|
|
Robert
Borden
|
1911-1920
|
|
18
|
21
|
20
|
3
|
|
62
|
|
Arthur
Meighen
|
1921
|
|
2
|
7
|
4
|
2
|
|
15
|
|
Mackenzie
King
|
1922-1930
|
1
|
7
|
21
|
13
|
2
|
|
44
|
1
|
Rober
Bennett
|
1931-1935
|
|
6
|
12
|
8
|
7
|
|
33
|
1
|
Mackenzie
King
|
1935-1948
|
1
|
5
|
26
|
26
|
1
|
|
59
|
|
Louis
St. Laurent
|
1948-1957
|
|
3
|
18
|
25
|
9
|
|
55
|
4
|
John
Diefenbaker
|
1957-1963
|
1
|
6
|
16
|
10
|
4
|
|
37
|
2
|
Lester
Pearson
|
1963-1968
|
3
|
12
|
11
|
10
|
3
|
|
39
|
1
|
Pierre
Trudeau
|
1968-1979
|
|
14
|
23
|
21
|
2
|
|
60
|
9
|
Joe
Clark
|
1979
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
|
|
11
|
1
|
Pierre
Trudeau
|
1980-1984
|
1
|
10
|
6
|
4
|
|
|
21
|
3
|
John
Turner
|
1984
|
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
Brian
Mulroney
|
1984-
|
|
7
|
20
|
14
|
1
|
|
42
|
10
|
Total
|
|
23
|
160
|
288
|
237
|
55
|
4
|
767
|
32
|
Sources:
The Canadian Directory of Parliament 1867-1967, the Canadian
Parliamentary Guide, and statistics compiled by the Senate Information
Services and the Library of Parliament
|
The primary function of the Senate
is to examine legislation originating in the House of Commons. In this respect,
the amount of legislative experience that senators have at the time of their
appointment is an important asset. It is also an acknowledged fact that the
vast amount of experience senators have acquired in public and private life
makes them excellent investigators. Over the past several years, the Senate has
earned a reputation for itself owing to the investigations conducted by its
standing or special committees. The government has even taken certain
initiatives following the release of a Senate report. Because they do not have
to concern themselves with getting re-elected, Senators remain on the job for
many years and thus become considerable experts in their field.