PDF
Pierre Pettigrew
Parliamentarians are an
essential link between citizens and their government and play a special role in
bridging domestic and international concerns through information exchange. This
role requires MPs to be in constant contact with their constituents in order to
understand their needs and effectively speak on their behalf.
In addition parliamentarians
are in a good position to explain to citizens the importance of looking at the
world as a global marketplace where the free flow of goods and services is key
to sustaining Canada’s prosperity in the 21st Century. This pedagogical role is
essential because international trade is not at the top of the public’s
concerns, except for the brief surge of interest during prominent cases and
disputes or high-level meetings, which are at the centre of media attention.
Hence, by encouraging public awareness and understanding of international
trade, as well as citizen participation in public consultations,
parliamentarians are critical to the development of trade strategies and
policies that reflect the priorities and interests of Canadians.
While there are many avenues
for MPs to scrutinize the government’s actions and policies in regards to
trade, I view the work of parliamentary committees as a key instrument for MPs
to not only increase their knowledge and understanding with respect to Canada’s
trade strategy, but also to contribute to the development and refinement of
this strategy by seeking clarifications or issuing recommendations on a
particular policy area. The studies and reports of parliamentary committees are
prepared through extensive hearings with all interested and concerned parties.
These hearings provide a common space for government representatives,
parliamentarians and citizens to have an open and informed exchange of views on
specific trade policies, proposals or programs. As such, they complement the
government’s commitment to seek the views of Canadians on Canada’s trade agenda
by involving MPs at the heart of this consultative process.
As Minister for International
Trade, I have personally asked the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Foreign Affairs and International Trade (SCFAIT) and the Standing Senate
Committee on Foreign Affairs to conduct studies on Canada’s trading
relationship with key partners in a bilateral, regional and global context. In
each instance, their reports consistently provided a fair, balanced and
exhaustive examination of key trade policy issues, and they have received
serious consideration. Government responses to many of the reports, coupled
with testimonies and briefings from Ministers and senior government officials
during parliamentary hearings, provide another opportunity for the Government
of Canada to keep its citizens and parliamentarians fully informed about the
strategic orientation and policy direction of Canada’s trade agenda.
Increasingly, parliamentarians
are not only engaging with their domestic constituents, they are also engaging
with their foreign counterparts (and by extension, either directly or
indirectly, with foreign governments) either by forming a common national front
on an ad-hoc basis to address specific issues or through their involvement in inter-parliamentary
networks and associations. The creation of these supra-national parliamentary
fora reflects the growing recognition among MPs that global issues, such as the
strengthening of a rules-based multilateral trading system, need to be addressed
at the international level. These fora provide a privileged avenue for our MPs
to foster trusting and candid relations with parliamentarians from Canada’s
trading partners, and to enhance their understanding of a particular Canadian
trade policy, position or proposal. The constructive and effective advocacy
work of these networks can thus complement the more traditional diplomatic
relations and negotiations between countries, which are the exclusive
responsibility of Heads of States, Ministers and officials from the Executive
Branch of government.
These fora also provide a
formal mechanism for parliamentarians to engage with inter-governmental
organizations like the World Trade Organization or processes such as the Free
Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) negotiations to ensure that trade-related
rule-making at the global and regional levels follow the same democratic
requirements of transparency and accountability that exist at home, and by the
same token promote these long-standing and deep-seated Canadian values and
principles abroad.
Canada has always been a
strong proponent of parliamentary diplomacy in international trade. At the 4th
WTO Ministerial Conference in Doha, Canada actively supported the resolution
adopted by the Inter-Parliamentary Union and the European Parliament that
proposed the establishment of a steering committee that would prepare options
for the engagement of parliamentarians in the WTO. We further supported adding
a reference in the Doha Declaration with respect to the role of parliamentarians
in this regard. Unfortunately, due to a lack of consensus, no such reference
was made in the declaration.
In Cancun, twelve Canadian
parliamentarians were part of the Canadian delegation. This was the largest
representation of parliamentarians ever to join our delegation to a WTO
Ministerial meeting and reflects not only our commitment to transparency and
openness in trade negotiations, but also demonstrates the value we place on the
contribution of parliamentarians in this regard.
The Canadian Government has
always encouraged inter-parliamentary relations in the Americas and has
supported in particular our Parliament’s leadership and commitment to the
development of the Inter-Parliamentary Forum of the Americas (FIPA). Indeed at
its creation in 2001, FIPA was first headed by my colleague, the current
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bill Graham. Canadians continue to hold key
positions in this organization and they have been the driving force behind
FIPA’s efforts to engage with Trade Ministers and other key government
officials on the margins of the upcoming FTAA Ministerial Meeting in Miami. I
have welcomed this initiative and have personally written to my counterparts in
the United States and Brazil, who are co-chairing the FTAA process, in support
of FIPA’s proposal. As an elected official and member of Cabinet, I am
convinced that involving parliamentarians at this crucial stage of our talks
will increase their awareness and knowledge base about the FTAA negotiations
and lend momentum to the successful ratification of the proposed Agreement.
In addition to their increased
presence on the multilateral and regional fronts, Canadian parliamentarians are
also working to strengthen bilateral legislative relations with the U.S. by
better engaging their American counterparts on key areas of concern between the
world’s two largest trading partners. There are ongoing efforts to bring
legislators together. For example last February 19 of my parliamentary
colleagues and I attended an event organized by the Canadian Embassy in
Washington D.C. to welcome the 108th Congress and become better acquainted with
its members. The event was a great success, allowing us to interact with more
than 1,200 congressional staffers and more than 45 members of Congress.
Moreover, last May, the
Canada-U.S. Inter-Parliamentary Group met in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario to
discuss a range of trade and economic issues. The group identified specific
items requiring special attention, such as meetings between Canadian and
American livestock producers; developing guiding negotiating principles for the
current WTO round of negotiations; and moving towards a permanent solution
regarding the bilateral softwood lumber dispute, to name only a few. This is
another clear example of the positive and constructive role parliamentarians
can play beyond our borders by articulating our differences with our partners
candidly and respectfully with a view to negotiate and find compromises that
will further contribute to the flourishing relations that Canada entertains
with the world.
Parliamentary associations are
not alone in demanding an increased role in inter-governmental institutions or
processes related to trade. Indeed other entities, and most notably NGOs, are often
circumventing governmental and parliamentary structures to demand direct access
and participation at the international level. Yet these organizations, despite
of valuable expertise in their respective policy field and their useful role in
bringing the concerns of the grassroots at the international level, do not have
the democratic basis or mandate to represent citizens that Ministers and MPs
enjoy through the holding of regular, free and fair elections. Hence, the
presence of NGOs in international affairs needs to be reconciled with the
traditional notion that elected officials are the main channel and the official
voice for aggregate citizens’ views to be legitimately represented in the
political arena.
I see these phenomena, namely
the emergence of inter-parliamentary associations and the rise of international
NGOs as significant actors in trade diplomacy, as the symptoms and
manifestations of a growing concern among citizens regarding the perceived
“democratic deficit” in global governance. In other words, some constituents
feel either absent or excluded from the conduct of multilateral trade talks,
especially as negotiations are nowadays moving away from tariff issues and into
more sensitive areas that may intersect with public policies such as in education,
health, the environment, labour, human rights, consumer protection, etc.
Addressing this “democratic deficit” is of paramount importance because
citizens are the foundation of democracy, and their support is essential to
have democratic legitimacy in trade policy. This is a multifaceted issue that
affects us all, governments, parliamentarians, and NGOs, because far from being
adversaries, we are partners in pursuit of a common cause: that is, to fashion
a world trading system, and indeed a global economy, that is faithful to the
interests and priorities of Canadians.
|