PDF
Deborah Hickman
On the afternoon of August
22, 2002 an unveiling took place in the hamlet of Pangnirtung (Panniqtuuq) on
Baffin Island, Nunavut. In the Peoples’ Community Centre, seven weavers
revealed to their friends, neighbours and families the result of their labours
of the past eight months; a ten foot high by twenty-two foot wide tapestry
designed to hang in the lobby of the Legislative Assembly in Iqaluit. This
article describes events leading up to the installation of the tapestry which
is a gift to the people of Nunavut from the Uqqurmiut Inuit Artist’s
Association.
Based on a watercolour by Pangnirtung artist Joel Maniapik,
the tapestry features a sensual landscape of rolling hills under a huge arctic
sky touched by the peach tones of sunset. An inukshuk, which in translation
means “like a person”, stands in the foreground. Dwarfed by both the land and
the inukshuk are the small figures of grazing caribou and approaching
travelers. The mural conveys the idea that in the arctic everything and
everyone has a place. It looks to Inuit cultural roots for a strong future.
Titled Back Then by the artist, the mural tapestry was ceremoniously
installed in its permanent place on September 10.
This tapestry is significant
for several reasons. For the weavers themselves it is a remarkable achievement.
By far the biggest and design-wise the most demanding tapestry produced by the
Tapestry Studio in its thirty-two year history, its production signifies a
return to the use of the studio’s twelve foot wide tapestry loom purchased in
1991 for the weaving of Our Ancestors Land is Our Land Now. Commissioned
by the Department of Economic Development of the territorial government for the
Unikaarvik Visitors Centre in Iqaluit, that seven foot by eleven foot
tapestry provided the experienced weavers with their first collaborative
weaving experience.
Tapestry weaving in
Pangnirtung has always been a collective activity. The source of the artwork,
the drawing, is the work of one artist while the interpretation of the drawing
into the medium of tapestry and the weaving itself, is done by another artist.
The annual selection of the drawings from the large numbers purchased from
artists in the community by the Studio and held in an on-site archives is done
collectively. Until 1991 the tapestries were of a size which made it possible
to weave them on individual looms – one weaver per loom. With the first
commissioned piece for installation in a public building and the purchase of
the large loom, the weavers for the first time sat side by side across an
upright loom. Up to ten weavers can be accommodated. The manner of working in
the studio shifted to resemble that of the European atelier from the fifth
century until present times. “This collaborative method of working is common
among tapestry studios throughout the world. With the making of Our
Ancestors Land is Our Land Now, the Pangnirtung tapestry weavers have
joined the ranks of such well-known studios as the Victorian Tapestry Workshops
in Melbourne Australia and the Edinburgh Tapestry Company in Scotland, studios
that employ weavers as artists-craftspersons to interpret the artwork of others
(some weavers are designers as well) in tapestry.”1
This move to a fully
collaborative working process is significant as it is truly in keeping with
Inuit values. Inuit have traditionally placed more importance on the survival
of the group over the individual. The harshness of the climate necessitated
interdependence among people. Each depended on the skills of the other for
survival. A traditional marriage for example involved the hunting skills of the
man supporting the woman while the sewing skills of the woman enabled the man
to hunt in life threatening conditions. Women worked together, scrapping and
preparing skins to sew, enjoying the camaraderie of the group. Weaver Igah
Etoangat reflects on this within the studio: “Twenty-five years at the Tapestry
Studio does not seem like a long time, as I really like the camaraderie of the
group of women who work here.”2
The process of creating the
mural tapestry for the Legislative Assembly was collaborative throughout. It
began in 1998 when the Legislative Assembly was under construction and ideas
were being discussed as to how to fill it with art. Members of NACA (Nunavut
Arts and Crafts Association) initially asked to locate art for the building,
suggested that a very large tapestry would enhance the huge foyer wall facing
the doors to the Assembly. It was this wall that the weavers began to dream
about as a future home to the biggest tapestry to be made in the history of the
Pangnirtung Tapestry Studio. The making of the tapestry was eventually to be
funded as a training process for the Studio as commissioning work is part of
its plan for economic self-sufficiency. The funding bodies included: the
federal department of Indian and Northern Development; Kakivak Association’s
Governance, Capacity Building and Accountability program; the departments of
Education and Sustainable Resources government of Nunavut; the Nunavut
Development Corporation; the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut; the Uqqurmiut Inuit
Artists’ Association. The tapestry would be installed in the Legislature
as a gift to the people of Nunavut.
In 1998/99 artists in
Pangnirtung began to work on drawings for the design. Blueprints of the space
were obtained so that the space could be envisioned and drawings made to scale.
The funding was finally put into place towards the end of 2001. Excitment began
to build in the Studio as the weavers pondered the selection of the design,
finally settling on a landscape by Joel Maniapik.
Maniapik’s watercolour design,
though a departure from the coloured pencil, graphite and marker drawings of
the first two decades of tapestry making, were not new to the weavers as the
basis for their tapestries. In 1992 weaver Leesee Kakee selected a
watercolour by Maniapik which was to become the bestselling Approaching
Storm. Made in a limited edition of ten, as are all of the tapestries, it
was followed by thirteen more tapestries based on the artwork of Maniapik over
the next nine years. The interpretation of watercolour painting into
tapestry poses different challenges requiring different solutions. The weavers
rose to the challenge, expanding their roster of techniques and palate of
colours. Colour was particularly challenging. A wide colour palette of fine persian
yarns was imported and single strands were plyed together creating the
fifty-five different blends required to capture the many hues of Maniapik’s
painting.
The next big challenge was the
making of the cartoon - the scaled-up actual sized design on brown paper which
serves as a blue print from which the weaver work. In recent years the cartoons
have been made by scanning the drawing, projecting it on a wall and tracing the
lines. But a 10’ x 22’ projected image was too big to work with, the watercolour
strokes blurring through projection. The solution was found by scanning the
painting, painstakingly enlarging each square inch 200% and printing 297
separate sheets in colour which were glued onto a brown paper background.
This created a full colour cartoon, which, when colour coded with fifty-five
blended colours, resembled a huge paint-by-number painting. The last challenge
belonged to the team of seven weavers who worked side by side across the ten
foot wide span of warp for six months to complete the twenty-two foot wide
tapestry.
The reaction of the people of
the community of Pangnirtung, the gasps of delight and appreciation, was
indicative of the success of the finished piece. A similar reaction met
the tapestry, when it was unveiled in the foyer of the Legislature in Iqaluit
on September 10, by several hundred town residents as well as members of the
Legislature including premier Paul Okalik and host for the evening Peter
Kilabuk, minister of Education and MLA for Pangnirtung. Joel Maniapik who resides
in Iqaluit working for Nunavut Arctic College was present as were Geetee
Maniapik, head weaver on the project and Anna Etuangat a tapestry weaver.
Unfortunately, due to bad weather, Chairperson of the Uqqurmiut board Jacopie
Maniapik and the other five weavers of the tapestry, Jeannie Nakoolak, Kawtysie
Kakee, Igah Etoangat, Geela Keenainak and Leesee Mary Kakee were not able to
attend the evening’s celebration.
Significant an achievement in
itself, this tapestry can be seen as much more than a splendid piece of art.
The collaborative process employed in the creation of Back Then is
philosophically in keeping with the history of the Uqqurmiut Inuit Artists
Association (UIAA).
The story of Uqqurmiut
(which translates as “the people of the leeside”) is the story of the
collective spirit at work in a community
The Uqqurmiut Centre, built
and owned by the UIAA, is more than just a building where the people of
Pangnirtung find employment as artists and artisans. It grew out of the
determination of the printmakers of Pangnirtung who, in 1988, after fifteen
years of support, primarily by the Arctic Co-operatives Limited, lost both
their funding and their home in the Pangnirtung Co-op. In the introduction to
the 1992 catalogue of prints, then Chairperson Rose Okpik, wrote:
Five years ago we were told
that the Print Shop had to close. It could no longer be supported by the Co-op,
nor by the Government. Many of us were determined that the Print Shop would not
be closed, or, at least, that this would not be a permanent situation. This is
why we formed the Uqqurmiut Inuit Artists Association. We needed an
organization that was not wholly dependent on outside funding, and whose
priorities would be those of the artists of this community. We needed an
organization that the Inuit of Pangnirtung would own and control, that could
provide support for artists like the print makers, because outside support had
failed them.3
The UIAA was formally
incorporated in April 1988 and to the present day has been directed by an Inuit
board of artists, all residents of the community. Initially all were
printmakers and drawers, but it soon grew to include sculptors, weavers, sewers
and arts supporters. Money was raised locally through bingos and other
community events and through funds from both the federal and territorial
governments. The Uqqurmiut Centre for Arts and Crafts was opened on May
31, 1991 housing a weaving Studio (replacing the old ‘Weave Shop’ occupied by
weavers since 1969) offices and a gallery and retail store. The former ‘Weave
Shop”, attached to the new building, became the temporary home of the
printmakers. Printmaking resumed there under the auspices of the UIAA, issuing
a collection in 1992 with financial assistance from several levels of
government as well as corporate sponsorship. But as Okpik says, it was more
than the financial backing which brought back printmaking:
None of this financial support
would mean anything if it were not for the print makers themselves, and their
determination to see the Pangnirtung Print Shop revived. They always said that
if they had their own print shop, then they could be self-reliant……the print
makers have proved their point. The Print Shop is again a lively and exciting
place to be in, and people are happy to work there. And here we have a new
Community Print Collection, the first in four years!4
The determination reflected in
that statement has seen the Uqqurmiut through many struggles. The fire of March
1995 which destroyed the temporary print shop, the presses and some of the drawings
was a great blow but did not diminish the determination of the print makers to
issue their annual collection and in record time attract enough money to open a
brand new equipped shop in 1997. In an article by former print making advisor
John Houston, about the fire and the creation of that collection, he quotes
Jacoposie Tiglik:
We hope that printmaking will
continue for our children and our grandchildren…we shouldn’t take it for
granted, seeing how easily it can be lost…. This is what we can do while we’re
able. And many qallunaat (non-Inuit) have heard of us now. If we can be
determined and of one mind, we can succeed.5
The Uqqurmiut Centre for Arts
and Crafts stands on a slight rise facing the beautiful Pangnirtung fiord. Its
two ound buildings resemble tents on the land, tenaciously holding tight to the
ground on which they sit. The buildings themselves designed by Iqaluit
architect Keith Irving are in themselves reflective of the spirit of
collaboration that is Uqqurmiut, not only metaphorically but in the way in
which they were designed. Irving met with members of the Uqqurmiut board and
various artists in Pangnirtung over a period of months to come up with a design
which satisfied everyone involved; culturally, aesthetically and practically. In
an interview with Robert Enright, Rose Okpik and Keith Irving discussed
the satisfying process which eventually led to a home for Uqqurmiut. In Okpik’s
words:
We were full of dreams of it.
We could see that building right there, even before he (Irving) finished the
drawing. We were so happy talking about that building. We were only planning to
get a print shop. We didn’t realize that we were going to get something that
big. It came out of our own culture and we were so happy that finally we were
going to show meaning to the people in the community.6
Like the buildings, Back
Then is a bigger-than-life testimonial to what the determination of the
people of this small hamlet of twelve hundred people can achieve when they work
together. The weavers, now with their third commission under their belts, look
forward to more to come. They know that as a team they can weave just about
anything and that their strength is in their collective skill and vision.
Master weaver Geela Keenainak explains “ I don’t place importance on
myself as a weaver but on the group as a whole. I really enjoy it when we work
together on a commission.”7
Notes
1. Deborah M. Hickman, “Tapestry: A Northern
Legacy.” In Nuvisavik the Place Where we Weave, Canadian
Museum of Civilization, McGill-Queen’s University Press, University of
Washington Press, 2002, p. 49.
2. ibid. p. 193.
3. Rose Okpik, From the introduction, The
Pangnirtung Community Print Collection, Uqqurmiut Inuit Artists
Association, 1992, p. 7.
4. Ibid. p. 8.
5. John Houston, “Art and Soul”, Equinox No.
81, 1995 p. 81.
6. Robert Enright, from the interview “Shaping
Conversation”, Border Crossing, 1992, p. 91.
7. Deborah M. Hickman, op. cit. p. 194.
|